Genetic Diversity Analysis of Maize Hybrids Through Morphological Traits and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Parsabadeh-Moghan

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

Comparing different methods of estimating the genetic diversity could define their usefulness in plant breeding programs. In this study, a total of 18 morphological traits and 20 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci were used to study the morphological and genetic diversity among 20 maize hybrids selected from different countries, and to classify the hybrids into groups based on molecular profiles and morphological traits. To collect morphological data, a field experiment was carried out using an RBCD design with three replications in Moghan, Ardabil, Iran. The highest estimates for genetic coefficients of variation were observed in anthesis-silking interval, followed by grain yields, leaf chlorophyll rates, kernel row numbers, and ear heights. The total number of PCR-amplified products was 84 bands, all of which were polymorphic. Among the studied primers,NC009,BNLG1108,BNLG1194,PHI026 and PHI057 showed the maximum polymorphism information content(PIC) and the greatest diversity. To determine the genetic relationship among maize hybrids, the cluster analysis was performed based on both morphological traits(using the Ward method) and SSR markers (using the CLINK method). The cluster analysis of morphological traits divided the maize hybrids into five groups. Furthermore, Maize hybrids were divided into seven main groups based on SSR markers. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of a similarity matrix of hybrids for SSR data showed that the first 15 coordinates explained 97.21% of the total variance, whereas the first two coordinates explained only 33.14% of the total variance. Generally, results indicated that SSR markers were able to classify closely related maize hybrids more efficiently than morphological traits.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Agraw, D., Sukumar-Saha, C. and May, L. 1999. Use of cross-species simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers for developing polymorphic DNA markers. Journal of New Seeds, 1:25-37.

[2]     Barbosa-Neto, J.F., Sorrells, M.E. and Cisar, G. 1996. Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship. Genome, 39:1142-1149.

[3]     Beyene, Y., Botha, A.M. and Myburg, A.A. 2006. Genetic diversity among traditional Ethiopian highland maize accessions assessed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Genet Resour  Crop Evo, l00:1-10.

[4]     Choukan, R., Hossainzadeh, A.,  Ghannadha, M.R., Talei, A.R.,  Mohammadi, S.A. and Warburton, M.L. 2006. Use of SSR data to determine relationships and potential heterotic groupings within medium to late maturing Iranian maize inbred lines. Field Crops Res, 95:212 -222.

[5]     Enoki, H., Sato, H. and Koinuma, K.  2002. SSR analysis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines adapted to cold regions of Japan. Theor Appl Genet, 104:1270 -1277.

[6]     Gerpacio, V.R. and Pingali, P.L. 2007. Tropical and subtropical maize in Asia: Production systems, constraints and research priorities. CIMMYT Mexico, 93p.

[7]     Hashimoto, Z., Mori, N., Kawamural, M., Ishii, T., Yoshida, S.,  Ikegami, M., Takumi, S. and  Nakamural, C. 2004. Genetic diversity and phylogeny of Japanese sake-brewing rice as revealed by AFLP and nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet, 109 (8):1586-1596

[8]     Jambrović, A., Šimić, D., Ledenčan, T., Zdunić, Z. And Brkić,  I. 2008. Genetic diversity among maize (Zea mays, L.) inbred lines in Eastern Croatia. Periodicum biologorum, 110: 251 - 255.

[9]     Khayyam Nikoyie, M., Jahantighy, R., Soloki, M., Mohammadi, R. and Emamjome, A. A. 2009. Study of genetic diversity of different genotypes of Festuca arundinacea Schreb by means of AF LP markers. J Agric Nat Resour Sci, 16 (1-B): 351-360.

[10]  Maize Genetics and Genomics Database. 2010. http://www.maizegdb.org. (accessed  on 31.08.2010).

[11]  Mondini, L., Noorani, A. and Pagnotta, M.A. 2009. Assessing Plant Genetic Diversity by Molecular Tools. Diversity, 1: 19-35.

[12]  O’Neill, R., Snowdon, R.J. and Kohler, W. 2003. Population genetics aspects of biodiversity. Progress Bot, 64: 115-137.

[13]  Pabendona, M.B.,  Mejayaa,  M.J.,  Koswarab,  J.  and  Aswidinnoorb, H. 2009.  SSR-based genetic diversities among maize inbred lines and their relationships with f1 phenotypic data of MR4 and MR14 test crosses. Indonesian  J Agric, 2: 41-48.

[14]  Panaud, O., Chen, X.  and Mc Couch, S.R. 1996. Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) in rice (Oryza sativa L. ). Molecular and General Genetics, 252: 597-607.

[15]  Pejic, I., Ajmone-Marsan,  P., Morgante, M., Kozumplick, V., Castiglioni, P., Taramino, G. and Motto, M. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 97: 1248-1255.

[16]  Phelps, T.L., Hall, A.E. and Buckner, b. 1996. Microsatellites repeat variation within the y1 gene of maize and teosinte. J Hered, 87: 396–399.

[17]  Senior, M.L., Mutphy, J.P., Goodman, M.M. and Stuber, C.W. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci, 38:1088-1098.

[18]  Sharma, L., Prasanna, B.M. and Ramesh, B. 2010. Analysis of phenotypic and microsattelite- based diversity of maize landraces in India, especially from the North East Himalayan region. Genetica, doi:10.1007/s10709-010-9436-1

[19]  Shiri, M. 2013. Grain yield stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in different drought stress conditions using GGE biplot analysis. Crop Breeding Journal, 3:107-112.

[20]  Shiri, M. R., Choukan, R., and Aliyev, R. T. 2014. Study of genetic diversity among maize hybrids using SSR markers and morphological traits under two different irrigation conditions. Crop Breeding Journal 4 (1): 65-72. 

[21]  Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.D. 1979. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publ. New Delhi. 303 pp.

[22]  Smith, J.S.C. and  Smith, O.S. 1992. Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv Agron, 47: 85-140.

[23]  Smith, J.S.C., Chin, E.C.L., Shu, H., Smith, O.S., Wall, S.J., Senior, M.L., Mitchell, S.,  Kresovitch, S. and Ziegle, J. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet, 95:163–173.

[24]  Taramino, G. and Tingey, S. 1996. Simple sequence repeats for germplasm analysis and mapping in maize. Genome, 39: 277-287.

[25]  Xu, S., Liu, J. and Liu, G. 2004. The use of SSRs for predicting the hy-brid yield and yield heterosis in 15 key inbred lines of Chinese maize. Hereditas 141:207-215.

[26]  Zali, H., Farshadfar, E. and Sabaghpour, S.H.. 2011. Genetic variability and interrelationships among agronomic traits  in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Crop Breeding Journal 1: 127-132.