Optimizing the callogenesis and determining the gamma-ray intensity in leaf explant of cut carnation standard cultivars

Document Type : Original research paper


1 Department of Horticultural Science, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Department of Genetic Engineering, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Karaj, Iran

4 Ornamental Plants Research Center (OPRC), Horticultural Sciences Research Institute (HSRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mahallat, Iran


The present study has been designed and executed to determine the best growth-regulating compound for callus induction as well as to specify the optimum dose of gamma irradiation in carnation cultivars (Tabasco, Nobless, Cameron, Tabor, Eskimo, and Mariposa). In this experiment, an MS culture medium was used to evaluate the various levels of growth regulator concentrations including NAA in four levels (0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mgl-1), 2,4-D in five levels (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mgl-1), and BA in two levels (0.5 and 1 mgl-1). Irradiating the callus of leaf explants was carried out three weeks after cultivation at 0, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 55-gray doses-to determine the optimum dose of gamma radiation. The analysis of data and illustration of graphs were carried out via Excel software and according to the obtained results, the radiation level that killed 50% of the calluses was selected as the optimum dose for further experiments. The results have indicated that all main effects and the interaction effects regarding the characteristics of callogenesis percentage and callus volume were significant at a probability level of 1%. Means were grouped using Duncan's multiple range test, revealing that the highest level of callus induction was in Eskimo cultivar with a 73% overall mean. Overall, the results indicate that 2 mgl-1 2,4-D, 0.5 mgl-1 BA is the best regulatory compound for callogenesis in carnation cultivars. Moreover, it was found that on average, the 25-gray dose leads to suitable results in the callus explants of all cultivars. 


[1] Azadi, P., Kermani, M. J. and Samiei, L. 2018. Somatic Embryogenesis in Rosa hybrida (Vol. 84). Springer International Publishing.
[2] Bala, M. and Singh, K. P. 2013. In-vitro mutagenesis of rose (Rosa hybrida L.) explants using gamma-radiation to induce novel flower color mutations. J Hortic Sci Biotec, 88(4): 462–468.
[3] Datta, S. K. 2012. Success story of induced mutagenesis for development of new ornamental varieties. Biorem Biodiv Bioavail, 6(1): 15–26.
[4] Esmaiel, N. M., Al-Doss, A. A. and Barakat, M. N. 2013. An assessment of in vitro culture and plant regeneration from leaf base explants in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). J Food Agric Environ, 11(1): 1113–1117.
[5] IAEA, 2020. Mutant Varieties Database.
[6] Ibrahim, R., Ahmad, Z., Salleh, S., Hassan, A. A. and Ariffin, S. 2018. Mutation breeding in ornamentals, 175–211. Springer, Cham.
[7] Karami, O., Deljou, A. and Kordestani, G. K. 2008. Secondary somatic embryogenesis of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 92(3): 273–280.
[8] Karami, O., Deljou, A., Esna-Ashari, M. and Ostad-Ahmadi, P. 2006. Effect of sucrose concentrations on somatic embryogenesis in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Sci Hortic. 110(4): 340–344.
[9] Kumar, B., Kumar, S. and Thakur, M. 2012. In-vitro mutation induction and selection of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema Grandiflora Tzelev) lines with improved resistance to Septoria obesa Syd.                 Int J Plant Res, 2(4): 103–107.
[10] Lata, H., Chandra, S., Khan, I.A. Elsohly, M. A. 2010. High frequency plant regeneration from leaf derived callus of high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol yielding cannabis sativa L. Planta Medica, 76(14): 1629–1633.
[11] Arif, Saima Rauf, Aziz Ud Din, Mamoona Rauf, H. A. (2010). High frequency plant regeneration from leaf derived callus of high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol yielding cannabis sativa L. Planta Medica, 76(14), 1629–1633.
[12] Oladosu, Y., Rafii, M. Y., Abdullah, N., Hussin, G., Ramli, A., Rahim, H. A., Miah, G. and Usman, M. 2016. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: A review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 30(1): 1–16.
[13] Roychowdhury, R. and Tah, J. 2011. Assessment of chemical mutagenic effects in mutation breeding programme for M 1 generation of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Res Plant Biol, 1(4): 23–32.
[14] Sabaghi, H. R., Arab, M., Lotfi, M. and Akbari, M. 2013. Morphological characteristics evaluation of induced mutant lines of stock var. Centum White. Ann Biol Res, 4(4): 152–157.
[15] Sharma, C., Chandel, S. and Kaur, R. 2009. In-vitro callus multiplication and shoot regeneration of resistant calli of Carnation cv. ‘Raggio-de-Sole’ against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Floric Ornam Biotech, 3(1) 49-52.
[17] DaSilva, J. A. 2014. Callus induction from 15 carnation (Dianthus Caryophyllus L.) cultivars. J Plant Dev, 21(1): 15–21.
[18] Velmurugan, M., Rajamani, K., Paramaguru, P., Gnanam, R., Kannan Bapu, J. R., Harisudan, C. and Hemalatha, P. 2010. In-vitro mutation in horticultural crops- a review. Agric Rev, 31(1):  63-67.
Volume 8, Issue 2
December 2020
Pages 22-28
  • Receive Date: 22 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 January 2022
  • First Publish Date: 11 January 2022